Russian Federation
Russian Federation
One of the main factors ensuring a reduction in the risk of wild fires or their prompt elimination at the initial stage of a fire is the creation of an effective monitoring system. Obtaining reliable and timely data on natural fires makes it possible to increase the adequacy of management decisions aimed at responding to and minimizing possible damage from fires. The article discusses various methods of monitoring active wildfires in mountainous areas: space, aviation, ground and using unmanned aerial vehicles. An analysis of the advantages and disadvantages of each method was carried out. It has been shown that traditional methods have limitations related to the frequency of data acquisition, measurement accuracy, safety, cost and other factors. This is especially true when monitoring in mountainous areas. The use of unmanned aerial vehicles is considered a promising direction, as it allows one to obtain operational information with high detail. The advantages of unmanned aerial vehicles are noted in speed of response, maneuverability, economic efficiency and the absence of risk for direct performers. An example of a natural fire in a mountainous area that occurred in a specially protected natural area in one of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation, demonstrating the shortcomings of traditional methods, is considered. The feasibility of a combined approach for increasing the efficiency and accuracy of monitoring is shown.
unmanned aerial vehicles, monitoring, unmanned aerial systems, wildfires, mountainous terrain, management, modeling, interaction
1. Matveeva A.G. Dynamics of forest fires in the Russian Far East // Siberian Forest Journal. - 2021. - No. 6. - P. 30-38. - DOIhttps://doi.org/10.15372/SJFS20210603. - EDN HYXBFC.
2. Krot A.A. To the problem of determining economic damage from a forest fire: solutions // Fire and technosphere safety: problems and ways of improvement. - 2021. - No. 1(8). - pp. 229-237. - EDN PTFFZE.
3. Ecological and economic damage from forest fires on the example of the Ivanovo region / O. G. Zeinetdinova, P. V. Danilov, K. V. Zhiganov, M. A. Razvodov // Fire and emergency safety. - 2020. - No. 1(16). - pp. 83-87. - EDN GDUGWM.
4. Ministry of Natural Resources and Ecology of the Russian Federation. Order of June 23, 2014 N 276 “On approval of the Procedure for monitoring fire danger in forests and forest fires.”
5. Pham H.X., La H.M., Feil-Seifer D., Deans M., A distributed control framework for a team of unmanned aerial vehicles for dynamic wildfire tracking // International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS). - Vancouver, BC, Canada, 2017. - pp. 6648-6653. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1109/IROS.2017.8206579.
6. Matveev A.V., Burlov V.G., Matveev V.V. Fundamentals of the theory of analysis and risk management in emergency situations. - St. Petersburg: Information Publishing Educational and Scientific Center “Strategy of the Future”, 2003. - 407 p. - EDN ZBTTWN.
7. Matiev R.T. Features of extinguishing forest fires in hard-to-reach rocky areas under abnormal weather conditions and the absence of water sources // Socio-economic aspects of management decision making: Materials of the fourth interuniversity scientific seminar, Moscow, February 19, 2020 of the year. - Moscow: Academy of the State Fire Service of the Ministry of the Russian Federation for Civil Defense, Emergencies and Disaster Relief, 2020. - P. 156-161. - EDN LZLCTY.
8. Masyagin M.M. Comparative analysis of types and methods of monitoring forest fires on the territory of the Russian Federation // Fire safety: problems and prospects. - 2018. - T. 1, No. 9. - P. 585-588. - EDN YQIHIT.
9. Lobanov A.A. Geoinformation monitoring of fires // Educational resources and technologies. - 2015. - No. 2(10). - P. 119-126. - EDN TXNBAD.
10. Kobyzhakova S.V. Comparison of the results of monitoring natural fires in the Krasnoyarsk Territory with the ISDM-Rosleskhoz and CASCADE systems // Siberian Fire and Rescue Bulletin. - 2016. - No. 1(1). - pp. 45-48. - EDN XBEDPX.
11. Space monitoring of forest fires: history of the creation and development of ISDM-Rosleskhoz / R.V. Kotelnikov, E.A. Lupyan, S.A. Bartalev, D.V. Ershov // Forestry. - 2019. - No. 5. - P. 399-409. - DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1134/S0024114819050048. - EDN FHHQYM.
12. Analysis of technologies for monitoring natural fires in Russia. Review / A. O. Semenov, V. A. Smirnov, A. V. Surovegin, A. V. Maslov // Scientific forum: Innovative science: collection of articles based on the materials of the VI international scientific and practical conference, Moscow, August 28 - 04 2017. Volume No. 5 (6). - Moscow: Limited Liability Company “International Center for Science and Education”, 2017. - P. 34-38. - EDN ZEFFKP.
13. Thangavel K., Spiller D., Sabatini R., Amici S., Sasidharan S.T., Fayek H., Marzocca P. Autonomous Satellite Wildfire Detection Using Hyperspectral Imagery and Neural Networks: A Case Study on Australian Wildfire // Remote Sens. - 2023. - Vol. 15. - P. 720. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15030720/
14. Bouguettaya A. et al. A review on early wildfire detection from unmanned aerial vehicles using deep learning-based computer vision algorithms // Signal Processing. - 2022. - Vol. 190. - P. 108309.
15. Maslennikova G.E., Tazhetdinov R.R. Generalization of the results of assessing the main flight characteristics of Mi-8T and Mi-8MTV helicopters in the procedure for certification of an aircraft copy // Scientific Bulletin of the State Research Institute of Civil Aviation. - 2018. - No. 23. - P. 20-30. - EDN YSUPNB.
16. Flight manual for the Ka-32 helicopter. - M.: MGA, 1987.
17. Order of the Ministry of Natural Resources of the Russian Federation dated May 5, 2016 N 277 “On approval of guidelines for measuring the area covered by fire during a forest fire” (Registered with the Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation on September 16, 2016 N 43679).
18. Kudrin A. Yu., Zaporozhets A. I., Podrezov Yu. V. Modern methods of detection and monitoring of forest fires // Civil security technologies. - 2006. - Vol. 3, No. 4(12). - P. 66-67. - EDN JUIIOC.
19. Aral R. A., Zalluhoğlu C., Sezer E. A. Wildfire Classification Using Infrared Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Data with Convolutional Neural Networks // 2023 International Conference on Smart Applications, Communications and Networking (SmartNets). - IEEE, 2023. - pp. 1-6.
20. Nugumanov R.F., Melnikova A.S. Monitoring forest fires using UAVs // Mavlyutov readings: Materials of the XVI All-Russian Youth Scientific Conference. In 6 volumes, Ufa, October 25-27, 2022. Volume 4. - Ufa: Ufa State Aviation Technical University, 2022. - P. 303-306. - EDN ZFUFHD.
21. Osipov V.Yu. Modern methods of forecasting, monitoring and prevention of forest fires // Young scientist. - 2022. - No. 51(446). - pp. 626-629. - EDN DHXIOL.
22. Akhloufi M.A., Couturier A., Castro N.A. Unmanned Aerial Vehicles for Wildland Fires: Sensing, Perception, Cooperation and Assistance // Drones. - 2021. - Vol. 5. - P. 15. - DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/drones5010015
23. Fernández-Guisuraga J. M. et al. Using unmanned aerial vehicles in postfire vegetation survey campaigns through large and heterogeneous areas: Opportunities and challenges //sensors. - 2018. - Vol. 18. - No. 2. - P. 586.
24. Mokrova M.I. Study of the influence of difficult fire conditions on the quality of observation and safety of UAV flight // Izvestia of the Southern Federal University. Technical science. - 2021. - No. 1(218). - pp. 112-124. - DOIhttps://doi.org/10.18522/2311-3103-2021-1-112-124. - EDN DWNZLL.
