THE CONTRADICTION OF THE IMPLEMENTATION OF JUDICIAL PRINCIPLES IN THE ACTIVITIES OF PROCEEDING PARTICIPANTS AS DEPRESSION OF OPPORTUNITIES FOR THE ASSISTANCE OF JUSTICE
Abstract and keywords
Abstract (English):
Prevention and counteraction to the actively growing number of economic crimes, in particular, new types of fraud related to the use of IT technologies, is largely complicated by a weak evidence base in judicial practice. The paper considers the manifestation of the unacceptable implementation of key judicial principles in the procedural activities of an expert and a specialist when they are involved in order to assist justice. The article analyzes the impact of unresolved gaps in the inter-procedural features of the participation of state and non-state experts, as well as the lack of a clear regulation of the procedural status of a specialist on the identified contradiction during the trial. To resolve the contradiction, it is proposed to reform the legislative framework in the relevant aspects.

Keywords:
procedural status, expert, specialist, principle, independence, competitiveness, criminal, administrative, civil, autodepartmental, justice, non-state, evidence, conclusion
Text
Publication text (PDF): Read Download
References

1. Volynskiy A.F. Reforma sudebno-ekspertnoy i tehniko-kriminalisticheskoy deyatel'nosti kak neobhodimost' // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta MVD Rossii. – 2018. – №3. – S.186–191.

2. Rossinskaya E.R. Sudebnaya ekspertiza v grazhdanskom, arbitrazhnom, administrativnom i ugolovnom processe. – M.: Norma, 2006. –272 s.

3. Volynskiy A.F. Princip processual'noy nezavisimosti sudebnogo eksperta, a ne specialista // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta MVD Rossii. – 2019. – №1. – S.21-24.

4. Galinskaya A.E. Pravovye osnovy ispol'zovaniya special'nyh znaniy v sudoproizvodstve storonami i ih predstavitelyami // Teoriya i praktika sudebnoy ekspertizy. – 2011. – № 3. – S.20-24.

5. Sotnikov K.I. Konflikt pozicii sudebnogo eksperta i specialista so storony zaschity kak vyrazhenie principa sostyazatel'nosti v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve // Kriminalistika i sudebnaya ekspertiza: proshloe, nastoyaschee i vzglyad v buduschee: materialy ezhegodnoy mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferencii, Sankt-Peterburg, 01–02 iyunya 2017 goda / Sankt-Peterburgskiy universitet MVD Rossii. – SPb: Sankt-Peterburgskiy universitet Ministerstva vnutrennih del Rossiyskoy Federacii, 2017. – S. 298-305. – EDN YWOXTC.

6. Schepot'ev A.V., Safonova T.A. Pravovoy status sudebnogo eksperta i specialista v ugolovnom processe // Ekspert-kriminalist. – 2020. – № 4. – S. 35-37.

7. Nadonenko O.N. Problemy uchastiya specialista v ocenke nauchnoy dostovernosti zaklyucheniya sudebnogo eksperta // Dokazatel'stva i dokazyvanie v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve: istoriya, sovremennost' i perspektivy razvitiya: Sbornik statey po materialam Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferencii, posvyaschennoy 95-letiyu so dnya rozhdeniya Cili Moiseevny Kaz, Saratov, 03 aprelya 2020 goda. – Saratov: Saratovskaya gosudarstvennaya yuridicheskaya akademiya, 2020. – S. 96-98. – EDN POIOJS.

8. Hodikova N.A. Formirovanie logicheskoy kompetentnosti buduschego sudebnogo eksperta kak faktor garantii prava na sudebnuyu zaschitu // Nacional'naya bezopasnost' i strategicheskoe planirovanie. – 2019. – № 2(26). – S. 92-95. – EDN JISICH.

9. Ostrirova D.A., Pecherica E.V. Osnovnye problemy, voznikayuschie pri proizvodstve sudebno-ekonomicheskoy ekspertizy po delam,svyazannym s kriptovalyutoy // Nacional'naya bezopasnost' i strategicheskoe planirovanie. – 2019. – № 4(28). – S. 75-80. – EDN FSEDZW.

10. Zinin A.M., Ivanova E.V., Semikalenova A.I. Uchastie specialista v processual'nyh deystviyah. Uchebnik. – M.: Izd-vo «Prospekt», 2016. – 247 s.

Login or Create
* Forgot password?