Russian Federation
Peter's Academy of Sciences and Arts (First Vice president)
Russian Federation
Prevention and counteraction to the actively growing number of economic crimes, in particular, new types of fraud related to the use of IT technologies, is largely complicated by a weak evidence base in judicial practice. The paper considers the manifestation of the unacceptable implementation of key judicial principles in the procedural activities of an expert and a specialist when they are involved in order to assist justice. The article analyzes the impact of unresolved gaps in the inter-procedural features of the participation of state and non-state experts, as well as the lack of a clear regulation of the procedural status of a specialist on the identified contradiction during the trial. To resolve the contradiction, it is proposed to reform the legislative framework in the relevant aspects.
procedural status, expert, specialist, principle, independence, competitiveness, criminal, administrative, civil, autodepartmental, justice, non-state, evidence, conclusion
1. Volynskiy A.F. Reforma sudebno-ekspertnoy i tehniko-kriminalisticheskoy deyatel'nosti kak neobhodimost' // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta MVD Rossii. - 2018. - №3. - S.186-191.
2. Rossinskaya E.R. Sudebnaya ekspertiza v grazhdanskom, arbitrazhnom, administrativnom i ugolovnom processe. - M.: Norma, 2006. -272 s.
3. Volynskiy A.F. Princip processual'noy nezavisimosti sudebnogo eksperta, a ne specialista // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta MVD Rossii. - 2019. - №1. - S.21-24.
4. Galinskaya A.E. Pravovye osnovy ispol'zovaniya special'nyh znaniy v sudoproizvodstve storonami i ih predstavitelyami // Teoriya i praktika sudebnoy ekspertizy. - 2011. - № 3. - S.20-24.
5. Sotnikov K.I. Konflikt pozicii sudebnogo eksperta i specialista so storony zaschity kak vyrazhenie principa sostyazatel'nosti v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve // Kriminalistika i sudebnaya ekspertiza: proshloe, nastoyaschee i vzglyad v buduschee: materialy ezhegodnoy mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferencii, Sankt-Peterburg, 01-02 iyunya 2017 goda / Sankt-Peterburgskiy universitet MVD Rossii. - SPb: Sankt-Peterburgskiy universitet Ministerstva vnutrennih del Rossiyskoy Federacii, 2017. - S. 298-305. - EDN YWOXTC.
6. Schepot'ev A.V., Safonova T.A. Pravovoy status sudebnogo eksperta i specialista v ugolovnom processe // Ekspert-kriminalist. - 2020. - № 4. - S. 35-37.
7. Nadonenko O.N. Problemy uchastiya specialista v ocenke nauchnoy dostovernosti zaklyucheniya sudebnogo eksperta // Dokazatel'stva i dokazyvanie v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve: istoriya, sovremennost' i perspektivy razvitiya: Sbornik statey po materialam Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferencii, posvyaschennoy 95-letiyu so dnya rozhdeniya Cili Moiseevny Kaz, Saratov, 03 aprelya 2020 goda. - Saratov: Saratovskaya gosudarstvennaya yuridicheskaya akademiya, 2020. - S. 96-98. - EDN POIOJS.
8. Hodikova N.A. Formirovanie logicheskoy kompetentnosti buduschego sudebnogo eksperta kak faktor garantii prava na sudebnuyu zaschitu // Nacional'naya bezopasnost' i strategicheskoe planirovanie. - 2019. - № 2(26). - S. 92-95. - EDN JISICH.
9. Ostrirova D.A., Pecherica E.V. Osnovnye problemy, voznikayuschie pri proizvodstve sudebno-ekonomicheskoy ekspertizy po delam,svyazannym s kriptovalyutoy // Nacional'naya bezopasnost' i strategicheskoe planirovanie. - 2019. - № 4(28). - S. 75-80. - EDN FSEDZW.
10. Zinin A.M., Ivanova E.V., Semikalenova A.I. Uchastie specialista v processual'nyh deystviyah. Uchebnik. - M.: Izd-vo «Prospekt», 2016. - 247 s.
