Our website uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with this notice and the Terms of Use.
Journals
Books
Monographies Textbooks
News
Submit manuscript
National Security and Strategic Planning
Journals / National Security and Strategic Planning / Issue 3, 2025 / The impact of corporate social responsibility on sustainable development
UDC
330.341

THE IMPACT OF CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY ON SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT The impact of corporate social responsibility on sustainable development

Published in National Security and Strategic Planning · Pages 36–50 · Rubric: Economic security
DOI: https://doi.org/10.37468/2307-1400-2025-3-36-50
Received: 22.08.2025 Accepted: 17.10.2025 Published: 20.10.2025
Authors
OL
Olga Smirnova
SPIN
S.
S. Chelak
SPIN
NA
Natalya Pyatkova
SPIN
ABSTRACT
This article examines the impact of corporate social responsibility on the sustainable development of companies in the context of economic digitalization, increased competition, and growing societal demands for economic security and ethical business practices. The relevance of this study stems from the need to identify effective management tools that ensure the long-term competitiveness of organizations while simultaneously meeting social and environmental obligations. This paper provides a comprehensive theoretical analysis of the evolution of the concept of corporate social responsibility and systematizes the main scientific approaches to its interpretation. The relationship between corporate social responsibility and the concept of sustainable development, stakeholder theory, and strategic sustainability of a company is demonstrated. It is substantiated that the implementation of corporate social responsibility measures, despite short-term declines in profits, contributes to increased financial efficiency, reduced reputational risks, increased consumer loyalty, and investment attractiveness in the medium and long term. The theoretical significance of this study lies in its clarification of the content and role of corporate social responsibility as a tool for achieving sustainable development, as well as in its synthesis of approaches to defining strategic sustainability of a business. The practical significance lies in the potential for using the findings in developing corporate strategies aimed at balancing the economic, social, and environmental interests of stakeholders. Prospects for further research include developing methods for quantitatively assessing the effectiveness of corporate social responsibility programs, analyzing their impact on the economic security and sustainability of companies, and studying industry-specific and regional aspects of corporate social responsibility implementation.
KEYWORDS
social responsibility, sustainable development, economic security, corporate altruism, corporate egoism, compromise theory
Text References
Text
Text (PDF)
Read Download

1. Zavyalova E.B. Corporate Social Responsibility: The Evolution of Approaches and Ideas // Financial Business. - 2018. - No. 2 (193). - P. 26-31.

2. Freeman R.E., Harrison J., Wicks A., Parmar B., de Colle S. Stakeholder Theory: the State of Art. - Cambridge University Press, 2010.

3. Bowen H.R. Social Responsibilities of the Businessman. - N.Y.: Harper & Row, 1953.

4. Carroll A.B. A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance // Academy of Management Review. - 1979. - Vol. 4. - No. 4. - P. 497-505. – DOI https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1979.4498296

5. Blagov Yu.E. The Concept of Corporate Social Responsibility and Strategic Management // Russian Journal of Management. – 2004. – Vol. 2, No. 3. – Pp. 17-34. – EDN HTYFTP.

6. Safranchuk M.V. Social Responsibility of Corporations and Public Welfare (Economic and Theoretical Analysis) // Economy and Management: Problems, Solutions. – 2017. – Vol. 2, No. 3. – Pp. 46-55. – EDN YKUGDV.

7. Turkin S.V. How to Be Profitable: Make Your Business Socially Responsible. – Moscow: Alpina Business Books, 2007. – 381 p.

8. Lannon J., Lannon L. Capitalism without Egoism / trans. from English. OOO "Popourri", 2014.

9. Pichkov O.B. Corporate Social Responsibility of American Oil and Gas Companies / O.B. Pichkov // International Processes. - 2013. - Vol. 11, No. 1 (32). - Pp. 113-121. - EDN RVERNH.

10. Starikova E.A. The Importance of the Sustainable Development Concept in the Activities of Transnational Corporations // Economy, Entrepreneurship and Law. - 2017. - Vol. 7, No. 2. - Pp. 125-136. - DOIhttps://doi.org/10.18334/epp.7.2.38043. - EDN ZRRGFT.

11. Studenikin N.V. Sustainable Development in Public-Private Partnership Projects: Overcoming Conflicts of Interest // Comparative Politics. - 2015. - Vol. 6, No. 1. - Pp. 78-81. - EDN TQUKYZ.

12. Seleznev P.L. International Experience and Prospects for Implementing Public-Private Partnerships in Russia / P. L. Seleznev // Business in Law. - 2009. - No. 5. - Pp. 349-351. - EDN LMARUT.

13. Schneider V.V. Modern Interest in the Concept of Sustainable Development of an Organization / V. V. Schneider // Humanitarian Balkan Studies. - 2019. - Vol. 3, No. 4(6). - Pp. 71-74. - DOIhttps://doi.org/10.34671/SCH.HBR.2019.0304.0018. – EDN IDTIAR.

14. Boyle E.J., Higgins M.M., Rhee S.G. Stock market reaction to ethical initiatives of defense contractors: Theory and evidence // Critical Perspectives on Accounting. – 1997. – V. 8. – No. 6. – P. 541-561. – DOI https://doi.org/10.1006/cpac.1997.0124

15. Gilyarovskaya L.T. Economic analysis [Electronic resource]. – URL: https://institutiones.com/download/books/1338-ekonomicheskij-analiz.html (date of access 02.12.2023)

16. UN General Assembly resolution "Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development" [Electronic resource]. – URL: https://unctad.org/meetings/en/SessionalDocuments/ares70d1_ru.pdf

17. United Nations (UN) Global Compact. National Network of the UN Global Compact in Russia [Electronic resource]. – URL: http://www.globalcompact.ru (date of access 04/26/2020).

18. Fogel K., Morck R., Yeung B. Big business stability and economic growth: Is what’s good for General Motors good for America? // Journal of Financial Economics. – 2008. – No. 1. – P. 83–108. – DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2007.06.004

19. Zhu Jinxiu. Assessment of non-financial indicators and sustainable development of enterprises // The Economist. – 2018.

20. Diamond J. Big Business and the Environment: Different Conditions, Different Outcomes // Collapse: How Societies Choose to Fail or Succeed. – 2005. – P. 441.

21. Studenikin N. V., Zavyalova E. B., Zaitsev Yu. K. Corporate Social Responsibility: Textbook. – 1st ed. – Moscow: Yurait Publishing House, 2020. – 125 p. – ISBN 978-5-534-08409-2. – EDN FWKRKC.

22. Vashchalova T. V. Sustainable Development: Textbook for Universities. – 3rd ed., corrected. and enlarged. – Moscow: Yurait Publishing House, 2021. – 186 p. – (Higher Education). – ISBN 978-5-534-07850-3. – EDN IQOUTZ.

PDF Text JATS XML
The contact persons
Chairman of editorial board
Vladimir Matveev
070355mvv@gmail.com +7(911)791-08-80
508
downloads
RINC
© futurepubl.ru
Agreement Personal data protection and processing policy Support Powered by Editorum, 2026 Instructions
Login or Create
* Forgot your password?